Rebalancing: Definition, Portfolio Drift and Methods

Rebalancing is the process of bringing an investment portfolio back toward its target asset allocation after market movements or cash flows change the portfolio’s weights. It can be done by buying, selling, or redirecting new contributions.
Advertisement

Rebalancing is primarily a risk-control process, not a prediction about which asset will outperform next. Its purpose is to keep the portfolio aligned with the allocation chosen for the investor’s goals and risk profile.

Key Takeaways

  • Corrects portfolio drift: Stronger-performing assets can become too large a share of the portfolio.
  • Multiple methods work: Calendar, threshold, and cash-flow approaches are common.
  • Can create taxes and trading costs: Taxable accounts require extra care.
  • Not market timing: Rebalancing follows target weights rather than short-term forecasts.

Why Portfolios Drift Away From Their Targets

Suppose an investor starts with a 60% stock and 40% bond allocation. If stocks rise sharply while bonds are flat, the stock share can climb to 70% or more without the investor buying a single additional stock.

That drift increases exposure to stock-market risk. The portfolio may no longer match the investor’s intended balance between growth potential and stability.

Example: A $100,000 portfolio begins at 60% stocks and 40% bonds. After market changes, stocks are worth $72,000 and bonds $38,000, producing a roughly 65/35 mix. Rebalancing would move the portfolio back toward the original 60/40 target if that target still fits the investor’s plan.

Three Common Rebalancing Methods

MethodHow it worksMain tradeoff
CalendarReview and rebalance on a schedule such as annuallySimple, but drift can become large between reviews
ThresholdRebalance when an asset class moves outside a preset bandMore responsive, but requires monitoring
Cash-flowDirect new contributions or withdrawals toward underweight assetsCan reduce selling, but may be too slow for large portfolios

A portfolio can be rebalanced by selling overweight assets, buying underweight assets, or changing where new contributions are invested.

Rebalancing vs. Changing the Allocation

Rebalancing restores an existing target. Changing the asset allocation creates a new target because the investor’s goal, time horizon, liquidity needs, or risk tolerance has changed.

This distinction matters during volatile markets. Reducing stocks after a decline because losses feel uncomfortable is not necessarily rebalancing; it may be an unplanned reduction in long-term risk exposure.

Important: A target allocation should be reviewed before rebalancing. Restoring an outdated mix makes little sense if the investor’s goal or financial situation has materially changed.

Taxes and Trading Costs

Taxable sales of appreciated investments can create capital gains. Frequent trading can also create transaction costs, bid-ask spreads, or other friction even when commissions are zero.

Rebalancing inside retirement accounts generally avoids immediate capital-gain tax, although withdrawal rules still apply later. In taxable accounts, directing dividends or new contributions toward underweight assets can sometimes restore balance without selling appreciated positions.

How Often Should a Portfolio Be Rebalanced?

There is no universal schedule. Periodic reviews and percentage-band approaches are both common, and rebalancing generally works best when it is not done excessively often.

The right frequency depends on portfolio size, volatility, taxes, trading costs, and how much drift the investor is willing to tolerate before risk becomes materially different from the target.

What Rebalancing Can and Cannot Do

Rebalancing can systematically reduce positions that have become overweight and add to areas that are underweight. That discipline can prevent one asset class from dominating the portfolio after a long run of strong performance.

It cannot guarantee higher returns, prevent losses, or identify market tops and bottoms. A rebalanced portfolio still participates in the gains and losses of its underlying investments.

Sources